1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,848 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 626 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 260 (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 1600. (167 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Abarth | Volvo |
Model | 1600 | 260 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 73 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2660 mm |