1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 3,493 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 395 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1600. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 1600. (167 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 1600 | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 550 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2720 mm |