1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 1999 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 1999 SsangYong Korando is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 1016 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Because 1999 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 1999 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
Model | 1600 | Korando |
Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2490 mm |