1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 2000 Daewoo Musiro
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Musiro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Musiro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. (105 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Musiro weights approximately 291 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Abarth 1600 (167 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. (145 Nm). This means 1963 Abarth 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Musiro.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 2000 Daewoo Musiro | |
Make | Abarth | Daewoo |
Model | 1600 | Musiro |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 145 Nm |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 212 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2530 mm |