1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Ford Mustang. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 554 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (447 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 1600. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2580 mm |