1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 2002 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2002 Mahindra CL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra CL weights approximately 556 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Because 2002 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Abarth 1600 (167 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1963 Abarth 1600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 2002 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Abarth | Mahindra |
Model | 1600 | CL |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2040 mm |