1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Ford Windstar is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 1600 (155 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Windstar.
Because 1963 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Windstar |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3066 mm |