1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 4,300 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 1132 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 1600. (167 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 2008 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1600 | Blazer |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4300 cc |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2720 mm |