1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 2010 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2010 Renault Koleos is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Koleos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1600. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Koleos weights approximately 906 kg more than 1963 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 1600 | 2010 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1600 | Koleos |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 169 HP |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 744 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1855 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2690 mm |