1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1600. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Because 1963 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 1600. (167 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1600 | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | 1600 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2685 mm |
