1963 Abarth 1600 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 1600. (155 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 1600. (167 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 1600. 2012 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1963 Abarth 1600 has manual transmission. 1963 Abarth 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 1600 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | 1600 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
