1963 Abarth 595 vs. 1949 Allard J
To start off, 1963 Abarth 595 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 595. (27 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 595. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Allard J weights approximately 394 kg more than 1963 Abarth 595. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 595 | 1949 Allard J | |
| Make | Abarth | Allard |
| Model | 595 | J |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 594 cc | 4375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 864 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2980 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 113 L |
