1963 Abarth 700 vs. 2000 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 700. (63 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Neon weights approximately 591 kg more than 1963 Abarth 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Abarth 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (177 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 700. (69 Nm @ 5800 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 700. 2000 Dodge Neon has automatic transmission and 1963 Abarth 700 has manual transmission. 1963 Abarth 700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Dodge Neon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 700 | 2000 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Abarth | Dodge |
Model | 700 | Neon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 177 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1161 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3480 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 47 L |