1963 Abarth 700 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 700. (63 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1194 kg more than 1963 Abarth 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 700. (69 Nm @ 5800 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 700.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 700 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 700 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 695 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3480 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 78 L |