1963 Abarth 750 vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 799 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 MCC ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth 750 (43 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth 750 should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 MCC ForTwo weights approximately 195 kg more than 1963 Abarth 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 MCC ForTwo (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 750. (57 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 MCC ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 750.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 750 | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Abarth | MCC |
Model | 750 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 535 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |