1963 Abarth 750 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 750. (43 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 750. (57 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 750.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth 750 | 2002 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 750 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2210 mm |