1963 Abarth 750 vs. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth 750 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo (120 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1963 Abarth 750. (43 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 846 kg more than 1963 Abarth 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Abarth 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Daewoo Rezzo (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth 750. (57 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth 750. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo has automatic transmission and 1963 Abarth 750 has manual transmission. 1963 Abarth 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Daewoo Rezzo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth 750 | 2005 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Abarth | Daewoo |
| Model | 750 | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 61 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 64 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 535 kg | 1381 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |
