1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1958 Buick 40
To start off, 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1958 Buick 40 | |
Make | Abarth | Buick |
Model | Mono 1000 | 40 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 5971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3110 mm |