1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1964 Renault 8
To start off, 1964 Renault 8 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 981 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1964 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Renault 8 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1964 Renault 8 | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | Mono 1000 | 8 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 38 L |