1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1966 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph Vitesse (89 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Abarth | Triumph |
| Model | Mono 1000 | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 38 L |
