1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750
To start off, 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1969 Alfa Romeo 1750 | |
Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Mono 1000 | 1750 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |