1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1980 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1980 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 981 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Autobianchi A 112 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1980 Autobianchi A 112 | |
| Make | Abarth | Autobianchi |
| Model | Mono 1000 | A 112 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 30 L |
