1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,244 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 250 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mono 1000 | Colt |
Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2310 mm |