1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1992 Fiat Vivace

To start off, 1992 Fiat Vivace is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Fiat Vivace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Fiat Vivace (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Vivace should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Fiat Vivace weights approximately 250 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Fiat Vivace (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1992 Fiat Vivace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Abarth Mono 1000 1992 Fiat Vivace
Make Abarth Fiat
Model Mono 1000 Vivace
Year Released 1963 1992
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 981 cc 1372 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 64 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 90 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 86.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74 mm 55.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.1:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 560 kg 810 kg
Vehicle Length 3490 mm 3750 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2230 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]