1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | Mono 1000 | Sentia |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 2952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |