1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 1996 Opel Corsa
To start off, 1996 Opel Corsa is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Opel Corsa is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Opel Corsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Opel Corsa (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Opel Corsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 1996 Opel Corsa | |
Make | Abarth | Opel |
Model | Mono 1000 | Corsa |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2450 mm |