1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2000 Mahindra Bolero

To start off, 2000 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mahindra Bolero (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Bolero should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra Bolero (166 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.

Compare all specifications: