1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mono 1000 | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2790 mm |