1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2009 Hyundai Tucson
To start off, 2009 Hyundai Tucson is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Hyundai Tucson is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hyundai Tucson (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hyundai Tucson should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hyundai Tucson weights approximately 1221 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Hyundai Tucson is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hyundai Tucson will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hyundai Tucson (245 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Hyundai Tucson will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2009 Hyundai Tucson | |
Make | Abarth | Hyundai |
Model | Mono 1000 | Tucson |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 17.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1781 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 58 L |