1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo

To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Smart ForTwo (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Abarth Mono 1000 2009 Smart ForTwo
Make Abarth Smart
Model Mono 1000 ForTwo
Year Released 1963 2009
Engine Position Rear Rear
Engine Size 981 cc 1000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 59 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 90 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 72 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74 mm 81.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 3490 mm 2700 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 1870 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 33 L