1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2009 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Rodius (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 1474 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Rodius (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2009 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
Model | Mono 1000 | Rodius |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 80 L |