1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2010 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 981 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 291 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2010 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Abarth | Daewoo |
Model | Mono 1000 | Matiz |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 35 L |