1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hummer H3 (239 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hummer H3 weights approximately 1634 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Hummer H3 (327 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Hummer H3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
Make | Abarth | Hummer |
Model | Mono 1000 | H3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 327 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 102 L |