1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | Mono 1000 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 74 L |