1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1811 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Mono 1000 | ML |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2371 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2913 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |
