1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Abarth | Peugeot |
| Model | Mono 1000 | RCZ |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1359 mm |
