1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2012 Geely CK

To start off, 2012 Geely CK is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Geely CK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Geely CK (93 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Geely CK should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Geely CK weights approximately 480 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Geely CK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Geely CK (128 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Geely CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Abarth Mono 1000 2012 Geely CK
Make Abarth Geely
Model Mono 1000 CK
Year Released 1963 2012
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 981 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 59 HP 93 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 90 Nm 128 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 78.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74 mm 77 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 560 kg 1040 kg
Vehicle Length 3490 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1450 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2440 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 45 L