1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 1049 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | Mono 1000 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 981 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1609 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 67 L |
