1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1208 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | Mono 1000 | CTS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 11.3 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1768 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1442 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |