1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (306 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1746 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (443 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth Mono 1000 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | Mono 1000 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 981 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 443 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2306 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |