1963 Abarth OT vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 865 kg more than 1963 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Abarth OT | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | OT | CTS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3563 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2890 mm |