1963 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 931 kg more than 1963 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth OT | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | OT | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1741 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2858 mm |
