1963 Abarth OT vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 947 kg more than 1963 Abarth OT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Abarth OT | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | OT | CTS |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 304 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1757 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2880 mm |
