1963 AC Aceca vs. 1949 Buick 40
To start off, 1963 AC Aceca is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Buick 40 (148 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1963 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Buick 40 weights approximately 971 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Aceca | 1949 Buick 40 | |
| Make | AC | Buick |
| Model | Aceca | 40 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5249 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 87.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 109.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1865 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3000 mm |
