1963 AC Aceca vs. 1962 MG MGB
To start off, 1963 AC Aceca is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1962 MG MGB. (89 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1962 MG MGB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 MG MGB weights approximately 6 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 1962 MG MGB | |
Make | AC | MG |
Model | Aceca | MGB |
Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2320 mm |