1963 AC Aceca vs. 1967 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1967 Zastava 850 K is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Aceca weights approximately 39 kg more than 1967 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 1967 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | AC | Zastava |
Model | Aceca | 850 K |
Year Released | 1963 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2010 mm |