1963 AC Aceca vs. 1968 DKW Munga
To start off, 1968 DKW Munga is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 DKW Munga weights approximately 216 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca.
Because 1968 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Aceca | 1968 DKW Munga | |
| Make | AC | DKW |
| Model | Aceca | Munga |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 31 L |
