1963 AC Aceca vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (119 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 66 kg more than 1963 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Aceca | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Aceca | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2480 mm |