1963 AC Aceca vs. 1978 Seat 127

To start off, 1978 Seat 127 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1978 Seat 127. (51 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Aceca weights approximately 174 kg more than 1978 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Aceca (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 127. (76 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1963 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 127.

Compare all specifications: