1963 AC Aceca vs. 1979 Fiat 128
To start off, 1979 Fiat 128 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1979 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1979 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 AC Aceca weights approximately 19 kg more than 1979 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Aceca | 1979 Fiat 128 | |
| Make | AC | Fiat |
| Model | Aceca | 128 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1116 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |
